2003 Bugatti EB 218 vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Bugatti EB 218. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Bugatti EB 218 would be higher. At 6,255 cc (18 cylinders), 2003 Bugatti EB 218 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Bugatti EB 218 (544 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 386 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (158 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Bugatti EB 218 should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT.
Because 2003 Bugatti EB 218 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Bugatti EB 218 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bugatti EB 218 (650 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 400 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi TT. (250 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2003 Bugatti EB 218 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Bugatti EB 218 | 2010 Audi TT | |
| Make | Bugatti | Audi |
| Model | EB 218 | TT |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6255 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 18 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | W | in-line |
| Horse Power | 544 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 650 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5360 mm | 4201 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1359 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2469 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 60 L |
