2003 Buick Blackhawk vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Buick Blackhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Buick Blackhawk would be higher. At 7,458 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Buick Blackhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Buick Blackhawk (240 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (150 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Buick Blackhawk should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 234 kg more than 2003 Buick Blackhawk.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Buick Blackhawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Buick Blackhawk (692 Nm) has 380 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (312 Nm). This means 2003 Buick Blackhawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Buick Blackhawk | 2005 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Buick | Jeep |
Model | Blackhawk | Cherokee |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7458 cc | 3700 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 692 Nm | 312 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 91 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1633 kg | 1867 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2660 mm |