2003 Buick Rainier vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 Buick Rainier is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Buick Rainier (271 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Buick Rainier should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Buick Rainier weights approximately 25 kg more than 1964 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Buick Rainier | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | Rainier | 62 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 7028 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 2075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 79 L |