2003 Buick Rainier vs. 2010 Ford F-450
To start off, 2010 Ford F-450 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Buick Rainier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Buick Rainier would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-450 (326 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2003 Buick Rainier. (286 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 2003 Buick Rainier.
Because 2003 Buick Rainier is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford F-450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Buick Rainier will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-450 (814 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 373 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Buick Rainier. (441 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Buick Rainier.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Buick Rainier | 2010 Ford F-450 | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Rainier | F-450 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 286 HP | 326 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Torque | 441 Nm | 814 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 6670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 4390 mm |