2003 Buick Rainier vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Buick Rainier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Buick Rainier would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Buick Rainier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2003 Buick Rainier. (286 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Buick Rainier.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Buick Rainier. (441 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Buick Rainier.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Buick Rainier | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
| Make | Buick | Audi |
| Model | Rainier | RS3 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5300 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 286 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 441 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
