2003 Buick Regal vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2003 Buick Regal is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Buick Regal (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Buick Regal (312 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66. 2003 Buick Regal has automatic transmission and 1980 Volvo 66 has manual transmission. 1980 Volvo 66 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Buick Regal will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Buick Regal | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | Regal | 66 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |