2003 Buick Regal vs. 2010 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2010 Ford Falcon is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Buick Regal would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Falcon (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2003 Buick Regal. (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2003 Buick Regal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Falcon weights approximately 144 kg more than 2003 Buick Regal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Falcon (391 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Buick Regal. (312 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Buick Regal.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Buick Regal 2010 Ford Falcon
Make Buick Ford
Model Regal Falcon
Year Released 2003 2010
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3789 cc 3983 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 261 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 312 Nm 391 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 97 mm 92.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 99.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 10.3:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1560 kg 1704 kg
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4967 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1868 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1433 mm
Wheelbase Size 2780 mm 2838 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]