2003 Buick Rendezvous vs. 1979 Cadillac Eldorado

To start off, 2003 Buick Rendezvous is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Buick Rendezvous (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1979 Cadillac Eldorado. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Buick Rendezvous should accelerate faster than 1979 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Buick Rendezvous weights approximately 100 kg more than 1979 Cadillac Eldorado. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Buick Rendezvous is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Buick Rendezvous will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Cadillac Eldorado (365 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Buick Rendezvous. (285 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1979 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Buick Rendezvous.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Buick Rendezvous 1979 Cadillac Eldorado
Make Buick Cadillac
Model Rendezvous Eldorado
Year Released 2003 1979
Body Type Crossover Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3350 cc 5735 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 185 HP 168 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 285 Nm 365 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 91 mm 103 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 8.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1820 kg 1720 kg
Vehicle Length 4750 mm 5190 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1760 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2900 mm