2003 Cadillac Catera vs. 1963 Ford Cortina

To start off, 2003 Cadillac Catera is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac Catera (201 HP) has 152 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 482 kg more than 1963 Ford Cortina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac Catera (260 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (85 Nm). This means 2003 Cadillac Catera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina. 2003 Cadillac Catera has automatic transmission and 1963 Ford Cortina has manual transmission. 1963 Ford Cortina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Cadillac Catera will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Cadillac Catera 1963 Ford Cortina
Make Cadillac Ford
Model Catera Cortina
Year Released 2003 1963
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2962 cc 1558 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 201 HP 49 HP
Torque 260 Nm 85 Nm
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 81.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 85 mm 77.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1705 kg 1223 kg
Vehicle Length 4890 mm 4310 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2940 mm 2500 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 36 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]