2003 Cadillac Catera vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Catera is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac Catera (201 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac Catera (260 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2003 Cadillac Catera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac Catera | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Catera | 66 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2962 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1550 mm |