2003 Cadillac Catera vs. 2006 Nissan Interstar
To start off, 2006 Nissan Interstar is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac Catera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac Catera would be higher. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac Catera (201 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Interstar. (112 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Interstar.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Interstar (290 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Cadillac Catera. (260 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Interstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Cadillac Catera. 2003 Cadillac Catera has automatic transmission and 2006 Nissan Interstar has manual transmission. 2006 Nissan Interstar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Cadillac Catera will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac Catera | 2006 Nissan Interstar | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | Catera | Interstar |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 290 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Top Speed | 204 km/hour | 139 km/hour |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.9 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 100 L |