2003 Cadillac Catera vs. 2011 Audi RS3
To start off, 2011 Audi RS3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac Catera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac Catera would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 134 more horse power than 2003 Cadillac Catera. (201 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Cadillac Catera.
Because 2011 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Cadillac Catera. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Cadillac Catera. (260 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2011 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Cadillac Catera.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac Catera | 2011 Audi RS3 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Audi |
| Model | Catera | RS3 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2962 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 204 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
