2003 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 1950 Simca 8
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Simca 8 would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 367 more horse power than 1950 Simca 8. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1950 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 825 kg more than 1950 Simca 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS-V | 1950 Simca 8 | |
Make | Cadillac | Simca |
Model | CTS-V | 8 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5666 cc | 1090 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2430 mm |