2003 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 1962 TVR Grantura

To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 TVR Grantura. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 TVR Grantura would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 309 more horse power than 1962 TVR Grantura. (91 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1962 TVR Grantura. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 1001 kg more than 1962 TVR Grantura. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Cadillac CTS-V 1962 TVR Grantura
Make Cadillac TVR
Model CTS-V Grantura
Year Released 2003 1962
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5666 cc 1622 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 400 HP 91 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 99.1 mm 76.2 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92 mm 88.9 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.1:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1745 kg 744 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 3510 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1230 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 65 L