2003 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 1985 Lancia Y10
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Lancia Y10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Lancia Y10 would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 351 more horse power than 1985 Lancia Y10. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1985 Lancia Y10. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 895 kg more than 1985 Lancia Y10. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1985 Lancia Y10 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Cadillac CTS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Lancia Y10 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS-V | 1985 Lancia Y10 | |
Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
Model | CTS-V | Y10 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5666 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 70.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.9:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2390 mm |