2003 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 1988 Renault 25
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Renault 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Renault 25 would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (400 HP) has 310 more horse power than 1988 Renault 25. (90 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1988 Renault 25.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Renault 25, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (529 Nm) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Renault 25. (181 Nm). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Renault 25.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS-V | 1988 Renault 25 | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | CTS-V | 25 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5666 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 90 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 181 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 89 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2730 mm |