2003 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 1998 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1998 Ford Windstar. (200 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Windstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 55 kg more than 1998 Ford Windstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS-V | 1998 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | CTS-V | Windstar |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5666 cc | 3797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1690 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1920 mm |
