2003 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 45 kg more than 2003 Cadillac CTS-V.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Cadillac CTS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS-V | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | CTS-V | Ranger |
Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5666 cc | 2970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3010 mm |