2003 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 2004 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2004 GMC Sierra is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac CTS-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac CTS-V would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (400 HP) has 100 more horse power than 2004 GMC Sierra. (300 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Sierra weights approximately 537 kg more than 2003 Cadillac CTS-V.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (529 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Sierra. (488 Nm). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS-V | 2004 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Cadillac | GMC |
Model | CTS-V | Sierra |
Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5666 cc | 5965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 488 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 102.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.4:1 |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 2282 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 129 L |