2003 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 2007 Ford E-150
To start off, 2007 Ford E-150 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac CTS-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac CTS-V would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-150. (226 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (529 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-150. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-150. 2007 Ford E-150 has automatic transmission and 2003 Cadillac CTS-V has manual transmission. 2003 Cadillac CTS-V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Ford E-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS-V | 2007 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | CTS-V | E-150 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5666 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 226 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 90 mm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 132 L |