2003 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 2011 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2011 Ford Falcon is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac CTS-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac CTS-V would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2011 Ford Falcon. (265 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford Falcon weights approximately 12 kg more than 2003 Cadillac CTS-V.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (529 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Ford Falcon. (409 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Ford Falcon. 2011 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 2003 Cadillac CTS-V has manual transmission. 2003 Cadillac CTS-V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Cadillac CTS-V 2011 Ford Falcon
Make Cadillac Ford
Model CTS-V Falcon
Year Released 2003 2011
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5666 cc 3983 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 400 HP 265 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 529 Nm 409 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 3250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 99.1 mm 92.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92 mm 99.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.1:1 12.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1745 kg 1757 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4967 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1868 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1433 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2838 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]