2003 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac CTS-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac CTS-V would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (400 HP) has 321 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (529 Nm) has 421 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS-V | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | CTS-V | Micra |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5666 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 46 L |