2003 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 2012 Citroen C4

To start off, 2012 Citroen C4 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac CTS-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac CTS-V would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 313 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C4. (87 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 489 kg more than 2012 Citroen C4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (529 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 396 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C4. (133 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C4.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Cadillac CTS-V 2012 Citroen C4
Make Cadillac Citroen
Model CTS-V C4
Year Released 2003 2012
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5666 cc 1360 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 400 HP 87 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 529 Nm 133 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 3250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 99.1 mm 75 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92 mm 77 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.1:1 11.2:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1745 kg 1256 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4280 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 60 L