2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1943 Ford Taunus
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1943 Ford Taunus. (34 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1943 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 790 kg more than 1943 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 1943 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | CTS | Taunus |
Year Released | 2003 | 1943 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2390 mm |