2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1948 Fiat 1100
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Fiat 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Fiat 1100 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1948 Fiat 1100. (50 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1948 Fiat 1100.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 1948 Fiat 1100 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | CTS | 1100 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1948 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1089 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.3 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 7.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2710 mm |
