2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1949 Fiat 500
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 1949 Fiat 500. (16 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1949 Fiat 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1140 kg more than 1949 Fiat 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 1949 Fiat 500 | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | CTS | 500 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1949 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3563 cc | 569 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1280 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |