2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1950 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1950 Maserati A6G. (64 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1950 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 744 kg more than 1950 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 1950 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
Model | CTS | A6G |
Year Released | 2003 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 876 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2560 mm |