2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1951 DKW F 89
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1951 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1951 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 756 kg more than 1951 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 1951 DKW F 89 | |
Make | Cadillac | DKW |
Model | CTS | F 89 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 684 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 864 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2360 mm |