2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1952 Ferrari 212
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ferrari 212. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ferrari 212 would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1952 Ferrari 212. (163 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1952 Ferrari 212. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 800 kg more than 1952 Ferrari 212. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 1952 Ferrari 212 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ferrari |
Model | CTS | 212 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3563 cc | 2561 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 58.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 159 L |