2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1953 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1953 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1953 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 19 kg more than 1953 Talbot Baby. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 1953 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Cadillac | Talbot |
Model | CTS | Baby |
Year Released | 2003 | 1953 |
Engine Size | 3563 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1656 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3130 mm |