2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1956 Suzuki Light
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Suzuki Light. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Suzuki Light would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1956 Suzuki Light. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1956 Suzuki Light. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1956 Suzuki Light. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Suzuki Light. (34 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Suzuki Light.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 1956 Suzuki Light | |
| Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
| Model | CTS | Light |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1956 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 359 cc |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 34 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2010 mm |
