2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1959 Jaguar MK VIII
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jaguar MK VIII. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jaguar MK VIII would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jaguar MK VIII is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Jaguar MK VIII (210 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Jaguar MK VIII should accelerate faster than 2003 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Jaguar MK VIII weights approximately 145 kg more than 2003 Cadillac CTS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jaguar MK VIII (292 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1959 Jaguar MK VIII will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 1959 Jaguar MK VIII | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | CTS | MK VIII |
Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 3442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.3 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1765 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 77 L |