2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1959 Maserati Tipo 60
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Maserati Tipo 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Maserati Tipo 60 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Maserati Tipo 60 (198 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Maserati Tipo 60 should accelerate faster than 2003 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1050 kg more than 1959 Maserati Tipo 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 1959 Maserati Tipo 60 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
| Model | CTS | Tipo 60 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1990 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 198 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 570 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2210 mm |
