2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1961 Fiat Grand Break
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. (96 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 405 kg more than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (346 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. (142 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Fiat Grand Break.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 1961 Fiat Grand Break | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | CTS | Grand Break |
Year Released | 2003 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3563 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 346 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 37 L |