2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1964 Ferrari 158
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ferrari 158. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ferrari 158 would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1964 Ferrari 158. (208 HP @ 11000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1964 Ferrari 158. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1213 kg more than 1964 Ferrari 158. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 1964 Ferrari 158 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ferrari |
| Model | CTS | 158 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3563 cc | 1487 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 11000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 462 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2390 mm |
