2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1967 Chevrolet Camaro

To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2003 Cadillac CTS.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Cadillac CTS 1967 Chevrolet Camaro
Make Cadillac Chevrolet
Model CTS Camaro
Year Released 2003 1967
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2597 cc 4958 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 179 HP 290 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 245 Nm 393 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 4200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.3 mm 101.7 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.6 mm 76.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.2:1 11.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4700 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2750 mm