2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1967 Vauxhall Viva
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Vauxhall Viva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Vauxhall Viva would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1967 Vauxhall Viva. (69 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1967 Vauxhall Viva.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 1967 Vauxhall Viva | |
| Make | Cadillac | Vauxhall |
| Model | CTS | Viva |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3563 cc | 1159 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 69 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 77.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 61 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2440 mm |
