2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1969 Triumph GT6
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Triumph GT6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Triumph GT6 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1969 Triumph GT6. (104 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1969 Triumph GT6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 760 kg more than 1969 Triumph GT6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Triumph GT6. (159 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Triumph GT6.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 1969 Triumph GT6 | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | CTS | GT6 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 159 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.3 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 63 L |