2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1976 Nissan Cherry
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Nissan Cherry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Nissan Cherry would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1976 Nissan Cherry. (44 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1976 Nissan Cherry. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 905 kg more than 1976 Nissan Cherry. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (346 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Nissan Cherry. (65 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Nissan Cherry.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 1976 Nissan Cherry | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | CTS | Cherry |
Year Released | 2003 | 1976 |
Engine Size | 3563 cc | 988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 346 Nm | 65 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2400 mm |