2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW

To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW would be higher. At 6,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW (395 HP @ 5160 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW should accelerate faster than 2003 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 370 kg more than 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW (600 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 355 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Cadillac CTS 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW
Make Cadillac Mercedes-Benz
Model CTS CW
Year Released 2003 1979
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2597 cc 6328 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 179 HP 395 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5160 RPM
Torque 245 Nm 600 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1620 kg 1250 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4110 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1120 mm