2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1979 Monteverdi Military 250 Z Zivil
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Monteverdi Military 250 Z Zivil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Monteverdi Military 250 Z Zivil would be higher.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Monteverdi Military 250 Z Zivil, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Monteverdi Military 250 Z Zivil has automatic transmission and 2003 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2003 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Monteverdi Military 250 Z Zivil will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 1979 Monteverdi Military 250 Z Zivil | |
Make | Cadillac | Monteverdi |
Model | CTS | Military 250 Z Zivil |
Year Released | 2003 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |