2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1982 Ford C 100
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford C 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford C 100 would be higher. At 3,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Ford C 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 740 kg more than 1982 Ford C 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 1982 Ford C 100 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | CTS | C 100 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 3995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1710 mm |
