2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1982 Monteverdi Tiara
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Monteverdi Tiara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Monteverdi Tiara would be higher. At 3,837 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Monteverdi Tiara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Monteverdi Tiara (201 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Monteverdi Tiara should accelerate faster than 2003 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Monteverdi Tiara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Monteverdi Tiara has automatic transmission and 2003 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2003 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Monteverdi Tiara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 1982 Monteverdi Tiara | |
Make | Cadillac | Monteverdi |
Model | CTS | Tiara |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 3837 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3080 mm |