2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1984 Ford Escort
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Escort. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Escort would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1984 Ford Escort. (68 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Escort.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Escort, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (346 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Ford Escort. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Ford Escort.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 1984 Ford Escort | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | CTS | Escort |
Year Released | 2003 | 1984 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3563 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 346 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2410 mm |