2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1984 Ford Orion

To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Orion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Orion would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1984 Ford Orion. (74 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Orion.

Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Orion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Ford Orion. (111 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Ford Orion.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Cadillac CTS 1984 Ford Orion
Make Cadillac Ford
Model CTS Orion
Year Released 2003 1984
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2597 cc 1392 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 179 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 245 Nm 111 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4220 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2410 mm