2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1984 Mazda 929
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1984 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1984 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 468 kg more than 1984 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 1984 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | CTS | 929 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1152 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2620 mm |
