2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1986 Ford Bronco II
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Bronco II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Bronco II would be higher. At 2,934 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Bronco II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 170 kg more than 1986 Ford Bronco II.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 1986 Ford Bronco II | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | CTS | Bronco II |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 2934 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2400 mm |
