2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1986 Renault 9
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Renault 9 would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1986 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1986 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 855 kg more than 1986 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 1986 Renault 9 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | CTS | 9 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3563 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 72 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 38 L |
