2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1988 Acura Integra

To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Acura Integra would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1988 Acura Integra. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1988 Acura Integra.

Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1988 Acura Integra has automatic transmission and 2003 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2003 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1988 Acura Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Cadillac CTS 1988 Acura Integra
Make Cadillac Acura
Model CTS Integra
Year Released 2003 1988
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2597 cc 1500 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 179 HP 113 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4355 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1665 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1290 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2520 mm