2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1988 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Renault Megane would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Renault Megane (250 HP) has 71 more horse power than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 2003 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Renault Megane. (181 Nm). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Cadillac CTS | 1988 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | CTS | Megane |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1988 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 250 HP |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 181 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
